So, what is really the Google Chrome OS?

So, what is really the Google Chrome OS?

Some people compares it with Linux, and see it as an UI addon with the Chrome browser, but they miss the point. Google Chrome OS is really a paradigm shift. The idea is that nothing (except a crypted cache) will be stored locally. Everything else will be stored in the cloud.

That means that if you switch from one notebook to another, you will get exactly the same thing and environment.

For example, there are discussions why Chrome OS only supports SSD, and not the old disk types. The reason is speed. And it will not be expensive as you will not need much storage.

Another questions is why only some selected platforms will be supported. Again, the idea is not that you should replace your OS at your current home computer. The idea is that the next generation notebooks, as well as smaller devices, will bring a new way to work.

The goal of Google Wave

What is really the goal of Google Wave?

Is it to create a replacement for email?

Google have invited developers very early into the product process, long before most companies would open up access. I would say it is a form of Agile development. You get quick feedback on functionality, which makes it easier to find out what is really wanted.

I think Google doesn't really care what Google Wave is. They want to do something that people wants to use, and it doesn't really matter what it is as long as it gets popular. Because of that, the actual requirement specification is impossible to freeze early.

By involving users and developers this early, the Wave will have the possibility to evolve in a way that noone had anticipated.

Wave has some new ideas, or at least re-invented old ones. It is when you combine new ideas that real inventions are born. The type that few could have foreseen.

It will be interesting to see where this will lead. Will it be the next paradigm of Internet usage, or will be just another mail system?

Uploading a mind to a computer and the art of music

A friend of mine, interested in the ultimate listening experience of music, once thought about what it would mean if you could upload your mind to a computer. So we had a discussion about that. The first though was that you could get rid of a number of analog transformations that added noise to the signal. That is, the music could be fed directly to the (simulated) ear nerves. And so you would get a totally loss-free music experience.

But why stop it at that? When you enjoy a piece of music, there is some kind of mechanism in the brain that do the analysis of the music, which in turns generates the pleasing feeling. Why not directly stimulate this pleasure mechanism? That means you don't need real music any more. Another problem with an uploaded mind could be that it may have almost perfect memory. I believe that surprise is one important part of music. Again, this shouldn't really be a problem if you can simply stimulate the surprise handling mechanisms, and no real surprises are needed.

But then you may as well take it to the next step. Why not directly stimulate the pleasure generating part of the brain, and get exactly the same satisfaction as when you listen to good music?

It can be questioned whether it is the actual experience of pleasure that is the important thing, or the memory of this experience. Why not skip the whole thing about stimulating pleasure, and instead plant a modified memory of having had the pleasure?

Somehow, this doesn't look attractive to me. But then, the technology of uploading probably isn't going to be available for quite a while yet.

Google Wave and games?

There are many people who use email to send funny pictures and movies. It is not unusual for a film clip to come back again after a year, when it has spun around "on the Internet".

With Google Wave you can also attach games (in the form of extensions). I'm convinced that there will be will be a lot of people around the world who develop various funny things, which will then spread around on the Internet. Not only that, Google Wave supports multilayer games in real time. It is impossible to predict how these things will unfold, but it would not surprise me if many people that now send videos and pictures will feel compelled to switch to Google Wave so as not be left out.

This principle, to release forces free on the Internet, is extremely potent. There is an enormous creativity in "the world", waiting to be tapped. 20 years ago I started an experiment in the form of an online multiplayer adventure game where participants (after some effort) could extend the same game. It did not take long until the whole world (in the game) literally exploded by the most extraordinary ideas that I never could have imagined.

Of course, I really hope that there will be no problems with viruses etc. From the beginning, Microsoft Windows, Internet browsers and Office applications allowed almost anything do be done by scripts. Because of viruses and other types of malicious software, it is today severely restricted. In my dreams, I hope the day has now come where there is a trusted platform.

Google Wave and obstacles

It would be nice if all the blogs and news articles on the internet is made as Waves. Comments and responses can then be followed up in your Wave your reader without having to locate the original page. Not to mention how easy it is to add friends to the discussion.

But precisely this may also be a problem for Google Wave. A newspaper depends on their ads, and wants the users to return as much as possible. Wave reduces the need, which may mean that the newspaper chose not to use the Wave technology to publish articles.

The same problem may exist for big bloggers who earn money on their advertising.

Why Google Chrome?

Why are Google creating yet another web reader? There are already a couple of them in the market. Is it to get control over the end users? Some fear that Google will use it to be able to sell even more advertising.

I don't think that is the primary reason. Indirectly, yes, but not in a direct way. Google wants people to use the web more, and it certainly looks like it will be very big in the future. There are two interesting features with Google Chrome: Improved navigation and improved Java Script execution.

Improved navigation (using the Omnibox as well as the new tab page), will make it easier for users to find what they want and have them stay longer, browsing the world.

It is not obvious why Google spend a lot of effort on improved Javascript execution speed. However, when you consider O3D, you get a hint what it is all about. O3D is a plugin that supports 3D graphics using the hardware acceleration of the graphic cards. This plugin use Javascript for execution, and if it will become a success, it is not acceptable with slow applications. The hope is that there will be more 3D games available online, where you don't have to install anything. You simply execute them on the web. If these games only work good enough on Google Chrome, guess what is going to happen? All other web browse suppliers will have to improve the Javascript engine execution. That way, Google wins even if people use other web browsers. That is, people stay more on the internet.

And then, Google Chrome pushes html 5, which will even further improve web browsing.

Using Subversion in big projects

Requirements on the Subversion setup

1. It shall support an integration phase, where selected sub components are merged into one result.
2. The sub components shall be possible to develop independently on the main application.
3. The merged result shall be saved henceforth.
4. It shall be possible to take a selected merged result and afterwards find out what it was integrated from; what the versions of the sub components are.
5. All users of the application shall automatically get the same versions of the cub components, without having to do anything.

Suggested folder structure

This example project consists of one or more applications, where each one uses the sub components in Modules. Notice that the sub components in Module each have the usual branches, tags and trunk folders. The idea is that a release of a sub component is defined using a tag, or R1 in this example. Main projects should only refer to to the tags R1, etc, not to the trunk of a sub component.

If this project would have been check out from the BigProject level, each application would be able to refer to the sub components in the Modules using relative paths. However, the reference would depend on the tag names (R1, etc). Every time we would want to use a new release of a sub component, the source code in the main application would have to be changed so as to refer to the new tag.

Instead, a checkout of Application1 shall be done from trunk. Let's say it is called Application1. This folder will then have the property "svn:externals" added. This external definition will add one or more sub components from the Modules folder as a sub folder to the checked out project (Application1). The folder structure will thus look as follows. Notice that Core and Module1 look like they are part of the Application1 project.

The externals definition used for this are as follows. The peg revision was 28 in this example, but that of course depends on what version the sub components were released.

^/BigProject/Core/tags/R1@28 Core
^/BigProject/Module1/tags/R1@28 Module1

Notes

• Always use version number reference for externals, using peg revision format. That is, suffix the source path with "@" and the revision number. Otherwise, if a module is renamed or moved elsewhere, it can no longer be referenced. This is needed even if it is a reference to a tags item.
• The externals can be in the same repository or another one. If it is in the same repository, use the relative repository path address "^/Module1/tags/R1" for example.

Comments are welcome!

Lars Pensjö 2009-09-20

Cloud computing

There is a famous quote, usually misattributed to Thomas J. Watson at IBM:

I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.

With the development of cloud computing, the trend is again for using central resources instead of distributed computing. Maybe we end up with 5 major suppliers, in which case the above quote turns out to have an element of truth.

Mind and body

So, what is the relation between the mind and the body? Some thoughts about this:

1. There is an experiment where a volunteer is sitting at a table with one arm below the table. On the table is fake arm from a mannequin. If someone scratch on the fake arm at the same time and place as the arm below the table, the mind of the volunteer will swap the fake arm for the real one, and believe that the fake arm is the real one. This experiment can even be done with short wooden stock. If you then suddenly stick a knife into the fake arm, the volunteer will show the same stress symptoms as if under real threat.
2. There has been an experiment where they try to trick the brain into replacing the whole body (Strange Experiments Create Body-Swapping Experiences). Possible applications could be to fool the brain in a virtual world.
3. In the automotive industri, a lot of effort is spent into getting the right feeling when you drive a car. I now believe this is all about setting up an einvironment where the brain of the driver experiences the car as an extension of the body.
4. That would finally explain why it feels good to have many horse powers. The mind translate this into a feeling of a well fit strong body. That also explains why riding a motorcycle is such an extremly strong feeling. Not only does it give a very strong acceleration, it also provides a tight and effective control.

Economic bubbles

Looking at the bubble that just burst, I have some thoughts about this and what happened.

1. Now and then, there is an inbalance in supply and demand. Sometimes, this inbalance becomes very big. For example, suppose that mortgage interest rate is cut by half.
2. That means that you can, in theory, take a loan twice as big.
3. The first and immediate result is that people get more money to spend.
4. The second result is that people, in theory, can afford real estates for twice the price.
5. If the interest rate stays low for a while, the estate prices will increase a lot every year, for several years.
6. After a couple of years, the estate price should stop at approximately twice the price before the change of the interest rate.
7. But, because of the years of constant growth, some people now believe that the price can continue to grow.
8. The increase of price is now more like a pyramid game. It will continue until there is some disturbance.

What can make this chain of events even worse is if there are investments with leverage. That is, investors take loan to invest even more.

Change of interest rates is a simple example. Another common scenario is a technological change that will change the conditions for a market.

Pirate Bay, media coverage, Rainbows End and Belief circles

The current process against The Pirate Bay has some hidden implications. The superficial purpose is to find out if a couple of people is braking the law when they provide links to copyrighted material they don't own themselves.

The more interesting thing is that the entertainment industry wants to have control over the music, movies, etc. If The Pirate Bay is found to be illegal, maybe the problem can be fixed.

What many realize is that the technology has already passed a point where it is too late to turn back. I don't protect the right to share copyrighted material for free, but the outcome of the court will have no effect. The entertainment industry will have to find other ways to make money from it (and they will). This is understood by many people, but not all.

But the really interesting thing is not about file sharing, and I think most people are missing this. First some background: Reading the book Rainbows End, by Vernor Vinge, was very interesting. It is a story about the near future, with some exciting and frightening visions. At the time when I read the book, I was mostly interesting in the technical visions. But now I realize one of the more interesting visions are about Belief Circles. In the story, there are a huge number of spectators to an event (which I won't go into here). What was interesting about these spectators was the way they participated in the event. This was done mostly through electronic media (while some actually were in place). What I now realize is that this is just what is happening with the trial of The Pirate Bay.

For example, the coverage at Twitter consists of approximately 10 messages per second, and one of the persons, Peter Sunde, standing accused at the trial, is also participating with live comments (according to the Swedish site svt.se). The only thing we miss, that was possible in the book, is the possibility to participate and affect in the event with avatars.